The former only as CSU leader of Guttenberg's grace traded Horst Seehofer is now trying to score as its patron saint, makes front against Lammert and Schavan, who had practiced public criticism. "This was not solidarity. Belong to the same understanding of the Union should be that we stand by his own people, they are not related falls in the back", quotes the Cologne Gazette the Bavarian Prime Minister.
"It was not solidarity," as if to challenge the solidarity on the right. "Stand by their own people" as if it had the assistance of his own people against a different scale than against the political opponents. This attitude is widespread, but part the lack of credibility and inconsistent with the values. "The identity of the Union should be one," especially as it calls itself Christian, that the self-criticism should be given priority.
"are not related in the back" - "in the back," an oblique image and doubly wrong, for suggesting unfair and makes the case rather the other way around Guttenberg sense that Guttenberg is pleased with his scandal of the Union in the back.
And "not public" is wrong because it just took such public criticism from its own ranks, especially since Guttenberg's ostentatious self-criticism was dizzy again and always piecemeal evidence of their bad afterwards.
It was about the order, then internal criticism must be first, but for weeks indicated absolutely no evidence, but on the contrary, the public plea for an unquestioning loyalty without regard to the value base. Seehofer even boasted Guttenberg asked to hold out to have. First Lammert and Schavan straightened the value base and gave to the already inevitable Minister resignation probably the decisive impulse.
Seehofer criticizes the Chancellor before cocky that they have to answer for the "inappropriate handling" Guttenberg. And he lay "in the resubmission.
In Seehofer "resubmission" for contemplative hours should be: Popularity is a fine thing, but rather commitment to greater morality as a justification of less morality. Honesty must be more important than popularity.
Mark Rabago>> discussion
0 comments:
Post a Comment