is so awkward, no one the Egyptians recognition to deny their democratic success, but some are quite busy here, talking to the historical performance small
- because now rule instead of Mubarak, the generals, which is not so new ,
- because open is if and when it comes to free elections,
- because no free elections mean democracy, ...
probably know that the Egyptians - and it would add:
- the super rich are still remained and poverty.
But let's look at the positive side:
- The resignation was Mubarak's main demand of the mass demonstrations, and was applied,
- the right to protest is won,
- is the right of association fought.
People in Egypt may / may express their will. This is a victory for the dignity of man.
What is "revolution" at all?
Only totalitarian ideologies define the concept of revolution in a supposed complete program, although Totalitarian were never at / are celebrating individual stage victory as a "revolution", but they can not go on propaganda with reforms, but they give and continue as revolutionaries "from, because they are dependent on the permanent state of emergency to ensure that their rules only against the others are covered.
(political) revolution is that conditions on the powers and rules of the regime reversed by domestic political opposition. The credit side shows what turned round. And that was the first place, the revolutionaries important. And what else is left, is only now on the agenda. The generals made today, still beautiful promises. It will be important to ensure that they do not break the promises.
Mark Rabago>> discussion
0 comments:
Post a Comment